Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Int J Equity Health ; 21(Suppl 3): 193, 2023 01 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36694195

RESUMEN

Since the 2008 publication of the reports of the Commission on Social Determinants of Health and its nine knowledge networks, substantial research has been undertaken to document and describe health inequities. The COVID-19 pandemic has underscored the need for a deeper understanding of, and broader action on, the social determinants of health. Building on this unique and critical opportunity, the World Health Organization is steering a multi-country Initiative to reduce health inequities through an action-learning process in 'Pathfinder' countries. The Initiative aims to develop replicable and reliable models and practices that can be adopted by WHO offices and UN staff to address the social determinants of health to advance health equity. This paper provides an overview of the Initiative by describing its broad theory of change and work undertaken in three regions and six Pathfinder countries in its first year-and-a-half. Participants engaged in the Initiative describe results of early country dialogues and promising entry points for implementation that involve model, network and capacity building. The insights communicated through this note from the field will be of interest for others aiming to advance health equity through taking action on the social determinants of health, in particular as regards structural determinants.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Equidad en Salud , Humanos , Determinantes Sociales de la Salud , Pandemias , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Organización Mundial de la Salud , Política de Salud
2.
Int J Health Serv ; 40(2): 209-13, 2010.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20440965

RESUMEN

The authors describe the major methods and sources of information used in the EMCONET study for researching global, employment-related health inequalities. A systematic review of the literature provides valuable knowledge for research in this area. However, the limited number of studies, the poor quality of methods used, and a lack of theories or concepts have produced inconsistent results. To minimize bias from these limitations and to reach a comprehensive understanding of the complexity and health effects of global employment conditions, this article outlines key strategies for a synthetic, comprehensive, participatory approach: adapting transdisciplinary knowledge acquisition, building a theoretical model, employing multiple sources for data collection, and using a variety of methods (qualitative/ quantitative studies and narrative knowledge). This approach provides solutions to important research and policy needs regarding the global context of key employment relations, social mechanisms, and health inequalities. The strategies are adapted to synthesize input from several disciplines (epidemiology, sociology, and political science), social actors, and institutions. The study's main sources of information are a variety of digital, bibliographic databases; the authors reviewed the scientific literature from 1985 to 2008 and books, reports, and other documents from 2000 to 2008.


Asunto(s)
Empleo/organización & administración , Salud Global , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Investigación Participativa Basada en la Comunidad/organización & administración , Humanos , Salud Laboral , Organización Mundial de la Salud
3.
Int J Health Serv ; 40(2): 215-21, 2010.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20440966

RESUMEN

The authors develop a macro-social theoretical framework to explain how employment and working conditions affect health inequalities. The theoretical framework represents the social origins and health consequences of various forms of employment conditions. The emphasis is thus on determinants and consequences of employment conditions, not on social determinants of health in general. The framework tries to make sense of the complex link between macro-social power relations among employers, government, and workers' organizations, labor market and social policies, employment and working conditions, and the health of workers. It also suggests further testing of hypothetical causal pathways not covered in the literature. This macro-social theoretical framework might help identify the main "entry points" through which to implement policies and interventions to reduce employment-related health inequalities. The theoretical framework should be approached from a historical perspective.


Asunto(s)
Empleo/organización & administración , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Salud Laboral , Medio Social , Salud Global , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Renta/estadística & datos numéricos , Poder Psicológico , Política Pública , Lugar de Trabajo/organización & administración , Organización Mundial de la Salud
4.
Int J Health Serv ; 40(2): 223-7, 2010.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20440967

RESUMEN

Theoretical models are a way of visualizing, in context, the many factors that contribute to inequalities in health. This article presents a model showing the micro-level pathways relating employment and working conditions to health inequalities. A first important (indirect) pathway runs through the unequal distribution of harmful working conditions. Both employment and working conditions tend to be unequally distributed along the same social axes: social class, gender, ethnicity/race, immigration/migration status, territory, and so forth. Underlying mechanisms are exploitation, domination, and discrimination. Material deprivation and economic inequalities constitute a second direct pathway linking (nonstandard) employment conditions to health inequalities. In a third pathway, employment conditions may have an important effect on health inequalities via several psychosocial, behavioral, and physiopathological pathways. Although these several pathways are separated for analytical purposes, they are largely intertwined and, ideally, should be studied in an integrated way. The theoretical model presented in this article serves three main purposes: providing analytical clarity for organizing scientific data, encouraging further observation and causal testing, and identifying policy entry points.


Asunto(s)
Empleo/organización & administración , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Salud Laboral , Organización Mundial de la Salud/organización & administración , Salud Global , Humanos , Política Pública , Medio Social , Factores Socioeconómicos , Lugar de Trabajo/organización & administración
5.
Int J Health Serv ; 40(2): 269-80, 2010.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20440970

RESUMEN

Standard full-time permanent employment-providing a minimal degree of stability, income sustainability, workers' empowerment, and social protection-has declined in the high-income countries, while it was never the norm in the rest of the world. Consequently, work is increasingly affecting population health and health inequalities, not only as a consequence of harmful working conditions, but also because of employment conditions. Nevertheless, the health consequences of employment conditions are largely neglected in research. The authors describe five types of employment conditions that deviate from standard full-time permanent employment--precarious employment, unemployment, informal employment, forced employment or slavery, and child labor--and their health consequences, from a worldwide perspective. Despite obvious problems of measurement and international comparability, the findings show that, certainly in the low-income countries, these conditions are largely situated in informality, denying any possible standard of safety, protection, sustainability, and workers' rights. Considerable numbers of the world's working people are affected in geographically and socioeconomically unequal ways. This clearly relates nonstandard employment conditions to health equity consequences. In the future, governments and health agencies should establish more adequate surveillance systems, research programs, and policy awareness regarding the health effects of these nonstandard employment conditions.


Asunto(s)
Empleo/organización & administración , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Salud Laboral , Problemas Sociales , Lugar de Trabajo/organización & administración , Salud Global , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Renta , Política Pública , Medio Social
6.
Int J Health Serv ; 40(2): 281-95, 2010.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20440971

RESUMEN

The study explores the pathways and mechanisms of the relation between employment conditions and health inequalities. A significant amount of published research has proved that workers in several risky types of labor--precarious employment, unemployment, informal labor, child and bonded labor--are exposed to behavioral, psychosocial, and physio-pathological pathways leading to physical and mental health problems. Other pathways, linking employment to health inequalities, are closely connected to hazardous working conditions (material and social deprivation, lack of social protection, and job insecurity), excessive demands, and unattainable work effort, with little power and few rewards (in salaries, fringe benefits, or job stability). Differences across countries in the social contexts and types of jobs result in varying pathways, but the general conceptual model suggests that formal and informal power relations between employees and employers can determine health conditions. In addition, welfare state regimes (unionization and employment protection) can increase or decrease the risk of mortality, morbidity, and occupational injury. In a multilevel context, however, these micro- and macro-level pathways have yet to be fully studied, especially in middle- and low-income countries. The authors recommend some future areas of study on the pathways leading to employment-related health inequalities, using worldwide standard definitions of the different forms of labor, authentic data, and a theoretical framework.


Asunto(s)
Empleo/organización & administración , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Salud Laboral , Problemas Sociales , Lugar de Trabajo/organización & administración , Salud Global , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Política Pública , Medio Social
7.
Int J Health Serv ; 40(2): 297-307, 2010.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20440972

RESUMEN

The association between certain increasingly pervasive employment conditions and serious health inequalities presents a significant policy challenge. A critical starting point is the recognition that these problems have not arisen in a policy vacuum. Rather, policy frameworks implemented by governments over the past 35 years, in conjunction with corporate globalization (itself facilitated by neoliberal policies), have undermined preexisting social protection policies and encouraged the growth of health-damaging forms of work organization. After a brief description of the context in which recent developments should be viewed, this article describes how policies can be reconfigured to address health-damaging employment conditions. A number of key policy objectives and entry points are identified, with a summary of policies for each entry point, relating to particular employment conditions relevant to rich and poor countries. Rather than trying to elaborate these policy interventions in detail, the authors point to several critical issues in relation to these interventions, linking these to illustrative examples.


Asunto(s)
Empleo/organización & administración , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Política Pública , Lugar de Trabajo/organización & administración , Negociación Colectiva , Salud Global , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Salud Laboral , Medio Social , Problemas Sociales
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...